unrekt resolver / dossier

US-Iran Hormuz Agreement by September 30?

market: Yes 8¢ / No 92¢ · liquidity $26,516 · ends 2026-10-01 · market page ↗
Turns on whether a unilateral Iranian policy change qualifies as a 'diplomatic agreement' or whether formal bilateral US-Iran acceptance of the same agreement is required.
no published read yet — crux identified, evidence gathering

Resolution rules (verbatim)

This market will resolve to “Yes” if a diplomatic agreement between the United States and Iran over traffic in the strait of Hormuz is announced by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. A diplomatic agreement refers to an official agreement, treaty, deal, or substantially similar diplomatic instrument that establishes agreed actions, policies, obligations, or commitments between the United States and Iran. A qualifying diplomatic agreement must establish Iranian policies, obligations, or commitments aimed at permitting, restoring, or increasing vessel or shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. All listed countries must announce their acceptance of the same qualifying diplomatic agreement for the Payout Condition to be met. A joint announcement will qualify, as will separate announcements from each entity of its own acceptance of an agreement which, taken together, directly indicate that all the listed countries accepted the same agreement. Separate announcements of individual policies will not qualify if the policies are not announced as part of a diplomatic agreement. Each announcement must be a declarative statement that clearly and unambiguously communicates acceptance of an agreement. Statements that reference ongoing negotiations or a prospective agreement, or that allude to or express support for an agreement without confirming acceptance of the agreement, do not qualify. A qualifying announcement need not reference the agreement by name or use specific terminology, provided it clearly communicates acceptance of an agreement. Whether announcements from the listed countries represent a diplomatic agreement and whether such an agreement qualifies will be primarily determined through the announcements themselves. Where an announcement is made by all listed countries but, based on the announcements, it remains ambiguous whether the announcements represent a qualifying diplomatic agreement between the countries, this market will remain open until either i) definitive confirmation that the announcements represent a qualifying diplomatic agreement between the listed entities is achieved through further announcements from the listed countries or a consensus of credible reporting or ii) 14 calendar days (ET) have passed after the date that the last country made their first potentially qualifying announcement. If, at the end of the fourteenth calendar day, no definitive confirmation has been achieved, this market will resolve based on the totality of information available from the resolution sources at that time. No single statement, denial, or presentation of evidence will govern where it is contradicted by the totality of information. The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States and Iran and a consensus of credible reporting.

Rule requires 'agreement between US and Iran' but also says it must 'establish Iranian policies, obligations, or commitments'—language could permit unilateral policy as qualifying, contradicting the bilateral agreement intent. Text also truncates mid-rule.

Rules arguments from the market's own traders

Substantive resolution-rules commentary from the market's comment section, joined to each commenter's on-chain position (skin in the game) at collection time. Position ≠ correctness — read the arguments, weigh the incentives.

Spirit-LT no position 2026-08-05
read the market rules before making a purchase.
makeit1997 no position 2026-08-04
this market will resolve based on the totality of information available from the resolution sources at that time. It means it will be decided by your share of uma token

Big money on this market

Largest recent trades (≥$400). Flow: BUY No $4,242. Displayed as evidence of informed interest — NOT trading signals; by the time size is visible, price has moved.

BUY No $2,507 @ 86¢ 2026-08-22 · 0x879247bf… · wallet history: $14,180 redeemed / 19 resolutions
BUY No $653 @ 63¢ 2026-08-19 · 0x11f3c56d… · wallet history: $19,110 redeemed / 15 resolutions
BUY No $582 @ 81¢ 2026-08-19 · 0x28a28675… · wallet history: $3,194 redeemed / 7 resolutions
BUY No $500 @ 83¢ 2026-08-21 · 0x8a8bc992… · wallet history: $6,244 redeemed / 316 resolutions

Disputed precedents with similar wording

Past markets that went through UMA dispute and share wording patterns with this market's crux (keyword match v0 — precedent engine is early).

Will Iran close its airspace by December 31? resolved YES DISPUTED · 2027-01-01
Iran leadership change by March 13? resolved NO DISPUTED · 2026-12-31

Machine-readable

This dossier updates continuously. JSON: /m/us-iran-hormuz-agreement-by-september-30.json. Oracle precedent matches are rolling out.

unrekt resolver — independent resolution intelligence for prediction markets. We analyse how markets will resolve (rules, wording, precedent), not what will happen. We hold no positions. Every published read is timestamped and graded by the market's actual resolution. all wording-risk markets