Russia x Ukraine ceasefire agreement by October 31, 2026?
market:
Yes 8¢ / No 92¢
· liquidity $93,981 · ends 2026-10-31
·
market page ↗
Turns on what threshold of mutual agreement and consensus reporting counts as a binding ceasefire, and whether 'general pause' can exclude specific conflict categories.
no published read yet — crux identified, evidence gathering
Resolution rules (verbatim)
This market will resolve to “Yes” if there is a ceasefire agreement between Russia and Ukraine by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A ceasefire agreement refers to any mutually-agreed suspension of direct military engagement between Russia and Ukraine, which is either officially announced by both countries or confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting to have been mutually agreed by both countries.
A broader peace deal, normalization agreement, political framework, truce, or humanitarian pause will qualify if it includes a mutually agreed suspension of direct military engagement, to be effective on a specified date. Agreements that outline future negotiations or de-escalation measures without an explicit, dated commitment to stop fighting will not qualify.
Any form of informal understanding, backchannel communication, de-escalation without an announced agreement, or unilateral pause in hostilities will not be considered a ceasefire agreement.
Only agreements which constitute a general pause in the conflict will qualify. Agreements which only apply to specific conflict categories (e.g. restrictions on certain target categories or certain locations) will not qualify.
If a qualifying agreement is officially reached before this market’s end date, this market will resolve to “Yes,” regardless of whether the ceasefire agreement officially takes effect after that date.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of Russia and Ukraine and a consensus of credible reporting.
Key terms 'mutually agreed,' 'consensus confirmation,' and 'general pause in the conflict' lack precise thresholds. Rule excludes agreements limiting only specific categories, but boundary between general and category-specific is vague.
Rules arguments from the market's own traders
Substantive resolution-rules commentary from the market's comment section, joined to each
commenter's on-chain position (skin in the game) at collection time. Position ≠ correctness — read the
arguments, weigh the incentives.
pink.impala no position 2026-06-04
Ukraine is the biggest scam ever, all they want is our money, never give anything in return, just whining and bitching. So ENTITLED.
pink.impala no position 2026-06-02
Ukraine such a burden to the rest of the world, such freeloaders, so entitled SMH
Arlette no position 2026-05-25
Who can trust this market after Polymarket rugged everyone with the May 9 "ceasefire." It resolved YES. And the next day the markets opened again for when will there be a ceasefire? If there was a ceasefire why are these markets still open. Kinda shamless.
TerreMoto no position 2026-05-18
Polyscam can halt trading and resolve this either way at any moment. They already did exactly that on the last RU/UA ceasefire markets
quincy777 no position 2026-05-15
seems like Polymarket decided totally ignore fair demands of those that got cheated in the same event earlier .Now they just included humanitarian pause as viable. Could not believe firm that plans IPO and usa entry to engage in such blatant money grab.
Big money on this market
Largest recent trades (≥$400). Flow: BUY No $67,546 · SELL No $33,769 · BUY Yes $10,698 · SELL Yes $4,097. Displayed as evidence of informed
interest — NOT trading signals; by the time size is visible, price has moved.
BUY No
$20,000 @ 81¢
2026-07-25 · 0xbe482cd6… · wallet history: $248,937 redeemed / 6 resolutions
SELL No
$9,000 @ 75¢
2026-07-06 · 0x264cbb72… · wallet history: $8,526 redeemed / 14 resolutions
BUY No
$6,350 @ 75¢
2026-07-01 · 0x742d56c7… · wallet history: $14,095 redeemed / 7 resolutions
BUY No
$5,412 @ 78¢
2026-07-25 · 0x71b5577c… · wallet history: $0 redeemed / 0 resolutions
SELL No
$5,262 @ 83¢
2026-07-29 · 0xe2349595… · wallet history: $27,042 redeemed / 6 resolutions
BUY No
$4,094 @ 82¢
2026-07-20 · 0x5eec1b59… · wallet history: $7,004 redeemed / 28 resolutions
SELL No
$3,767 @ 81¢
2026-07-25 · 0x5eec1b59… · wallet history: $7,004 redeemed / 28 resolutions
BUY No
$3,717 @ 78¢
2026-07-16 · 0x1b6022ae… · wallet history: $6,793 redeemed / 5 resolutions
Disputed precedents with similar wording
Past markets that went through UMA dispute and share wording patterns with this
market's crux (keyword match v0 — precedent engine is early).
Will Goldman Sachs or any of its underwriting affiliates serve as the lead underwriter in SpaceX’s initial public offering?
resolved YES
DISPUTED · 2027-12-31
Will Wells Fargo or any of its underwriting affiliates serve as the lead underwriter in SpaceX’s initial public offering?
resolved NO
DISPUTED · 2027-12-31
Will Opinion launch a token by February 28, 2026?
resolved NO
DISPUTED · 2027-01-01
Will Backpack launch a token by December 31, 2026?
resolved YES
DISPUTED · 2027-01-01
Will Iran close its airspace by December 31?
resolved YES
DISPUTED · 2027-01-01
Machine-readable
This dossier updates continuously. JSON: /m/russia-x-ukraine-ceasefire-agreement-by-october-31-2026.json.
Oracle precedent matches are rolling out.